Except that saying your cat's name is God, therefore God exists is a misnomer. If Microevolution is true, then why is Macroevolution false? How can you say "The carbureter and the piston engine is true, but the car as a whole is false?" It's not a technicality. It's how science works. You find evidence that supports your theory, and upon finding enough conclusive evidence, you prove your theory is true, and it becomes a scientific law.warsloth wrote: X'an a type of evolution among microbes and certain species is something we can see, yes. This may be considered fact.
Does this mean the "THEORY OF EVOLUTION" that all things came from one life billions of years ago... hardly provable. You got me on a technicallity. What is considered Macro Evolution, has not been proven.
I can name my cat "God" and state that God does exist as fact. I can tell you that I have evidence, because God is right here in front of me, and I have pictures. But that does not mean I am talking about the same thing.
For instance, I can prove gravity is true by dropping an apple and measuring the constant acceleration of its descent. Naming your cat does not verify the existence of a higher deific power.
You just don't like being wrong
